Free Consultations703-542-4500
Ashburn Child Pornography Defense Lawyer
Challenge to sufficiency of the warrant led to Commonwealth dropping the charge.
He is professional, responsive, and truly came through for me when I needed it most. I always felt informed and supported throughout the process. Highly recommend!
As the owner, founder, and managing attorney of Noorishad Law, P.C., Kaveh concentrates his practice in criminal and civil litigation across Virginia. Committed to helping people through difficult legal matters, he offers a free initial consultation.
125+
Star Reviews
I had a great experience. I was worried but he was able to work out a great deal, and made the whole process very easy for me. Im more than happy with the outcome. I would recommend him to anyone. So grateful, thank you!
In the age of the internet, law enforcement officials are paying more attention to sex crimes that may involve online activity, including child pornography offenses. When people are accused of downloading or sharing child sexual abuse materials (CSAM), they may face serious criminal charges. These charges may arise in a variety of unexpected situations, such as when a minor sends a nude picture to a classmate.
Regardless of the reasons for charges related to child pornography, a person's life can be destroyed by these accusations. Their reputation, relationships, and career may be affected, and if they are convicted of a CSAM offense, they will not only face serious penalties, but they may be marked for life as a sex offender. In these situations, it is critical to get legal help from a criminal defense attorney as soon as possible.
Child pornography cases involve complex legal and technical details, and certain defense strategies may be used to help show that a person did not commit the offense in question and avoid a conviction. The lawyer at Noorishad Law, P.C. understands the gravity of these matters, and he can provide the representation needed throughout the entire legal process. He will look at what happened during an investigation, what evidence may be used during a case, and what opportunities for defense may be available. With his help, a person can minimize the impact that these accusations may have on their life.
Understanding the ways law enforcement officials identify suspects in child pornography cases and the methods they may use during investigations can help people involved in these matters understand the charges that may apply. Investigations may involve issues such as:
Law enforcement agencies may monitor activity on networks used to share files online. While many people use these networks to download music, movies, or other content, some may distribute materials that fall under the category of CSAM. Some people may download files without realizing what they contain, which could lead to accusations of child pornography possession. Certain programs may also allow files that a person has downloaded to be accessed by others. This could lead to accusations of CSAM distribution even if a person was unaware of the nature of certain files and did not know that they could be accessed by other people.
Companies that provide online services, including internet service providers, email providers, cloud storage platforms, and social media companies, are required to report any activity that they discover involving child sexual abuse materials. An internet company may find that illegal materials have been downloaded using internet services, sent through email or direct messages, or otherwise transferred online. They may report these activities to law enforcement, and officers may investigate the activities and take steps to identify the person who allegedly downloaded or shared CSAM.
Some investigations may be based on tips from a person's spouse, a former romantic partners, a roommate, a family member, or a coworker. These parties may report that a person allegedly possessed or accessed CSAM. These tips are not always made in good faith, and false accusations may occur. Our attorney can investigate these types of tips and determine how to address them.
Child pornography may be found on devices that are used by multiple people. A family computer may be shared by multiple family members, or multiple devices may connect to a shared Wi-Fi network. In some cases, a person may not realize that their Wi-Fi network had been used by neighbors or other parties, and they may be accused of a child pornography offense even when they were unaware of any activity that had occurred.
Law enforcement agencies may conduct undercover operations online, posing as people who are interested in obtaining or sharing CSAM. A person who interacts with an undercover officer may be arrested and charged with attempted possession or distribution of child pornography.
Possession generally refers to having child sexual abuse material on a device or in a location that is under a person's control. Receipt may refer to obtaining CSAM through any means, such as downloading it from the internet or receiving it through a messaging application. The distinction matters, because the methods that were allegedly used to access materials could affect the criminal charges that may apply.
To be convicted of a child pornography offense, a prosecutor will need to prove that you knowingly possessed the materials in question. You should not be convicted of possession simply because files were found on a device you owned. However, a prosecutor may use information like browser history, search terms, and other digital activity to argue that you were aware of the material. Our attorney will examine all of the digital evidence in your case and challenge the prosecution's claims that you knew about CSAM on your device.
Yes. A conviction for a child pornography offense will require registration as a sex offender. In most cases, registration requirements will last for the rest of your life. Sex offender registration can lead to restrictions on where you can live and work, and information about your identity, where you live, and the details of the alleged offense will be available to the public. Our lawyer can help you avoid a conviction and prevent the consequences that come with sex offender registration.
Charges related to CSAM may involve complex digital evidence and other issues related to a person's alleged activities, including the computers or devices they used, the websites they visited, and the software that was allegedly used to download or distribute child pornography. Our lawyer can review the evidence and accusations in these cases and identify the best steps to take to defend against a conviction. His strategies may include:
Law enforcement officers are required to obtain search warrants before they can search a person's home or another location and seize their computer or other devices. A warrant must be supported by probable cause, which means officers must have enough information to show that there is a strong likelihood that a person has committed an offense. Warrants will also detail what locations can be searched and what items may be seized. If officers went beyond what was allowed by a warrant, if a warrant was not supported by probable cause, or if a search was performed without obtaining a warrant at all, our attorney can take steps to exclude the evidence obtained through these illegal searches.
The presence of files on a device does not mean that the owner knew the files were there or that they intentionally downloaded or accessed CSAM. Files may be downloaded by malware. Software settings may have led to downloads without a person's knowledge. Another person who used the device may have accessed CSAM. Our lawyer can work with digital forensics professionals to examine the files involved in a case, determine how and when they were accessed, and show that our client had no knowledge of these materials and no intent to possess or access them.
To be considered child pornography, materials must meet specific legal definitions. Images, videos, or other files must be sexually explicit, and they must depict a real minor. Our lawyer may raise questions about whether the material meets the legal definition of CSAM or whether the person depicted was actually a minor.
During an investigation, a police officer or other law enforcement official may engage in conduct that leads to a CSAM offense, even though a person had no intent to commit a crime. If an officer used coercion, intimidation, or other methods to induce a person to commit a crime that they would not have committed on their own, this is known as entrapment. Our attorney can review investigative methods and determine whether a person was pressured or manipulated into engaging in illegal conduct.
When you have been charged with a child pornography offense, legal representation can be crucial. Even if you learn that you are under investigation, it is important to take steps to protect your rights and address any charges that you may face. At Noorishad Law, P.C., our lawyer can provide the legal help you need to defend against these accusations and avoid the penalties that may come with a conviction. Contact our Ashburn CSAM defense attorney at 703-542-4500 to set up a free, confidential consultation.
People in Ashburn who face criminal charges will usually have their cases heard at the Loudoun County Circuit Court, located at:
We represent clients in Ashburn from our office in McLean, located at:
Noorishad Law, P.C.
8200 Greensboro Drive, Suite 900
McLean, VA 22102
(By Appointment Only)
703-542-4500 - Office
703-636-8945 - Fax
Reach out to us by filling out the form below or calling 703-542-4500. We are available 24/7 to address your needs, and we will provide you with a free consultation.
From our office in McLean, VA, Noorishad Law, P.C. provides legal help to clients and their families throughout the area, including Fairfax County, Arlington County, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Alexandria, Annandale, Arlington, Ashburn, Broadlands, Burke, Cascades, Centreville, Dale City, Dumfries, Fairfax, Falls Church, Gainesville, Haymarket, Herndon, Lake Ridge, Leesburg, Manassas, Montclair, Occoquan, Purcellville, Quantico, Reston, Stafford, South Riding, Springfield, Sterling, Stone Ridge, Sugarland Run, Tysons, Vienna, Woodbridge, and Woodburn.
Results listed are not a guarantee or indication of future case results.
