Dismissal achieved early by attacking the admissibility of evidence.
Kaveh is also a clear, responsive communicator who genuinely cares about his clients, offering both expert guidance and compassionate support..
As the owner, founder, and managing attorney of Noorishad Law, P.C., Kaveh concentrates his practice in criminal and civil litigation across Virginia. Committed to helping people through difficult legal matters, he offers a free initial consultation.
Hands down, Attorney Kaveh and the team at Noorishad Law Firm are exceptional. Attorney Kaveh is a beast in the courtroom and a true master of his craft. He is smooth, confident, knowledgeable, and completely dedicated to his clients...
Accusations of offenses involving child pornography are some of the most serious charges a person can face in Virginia. When law enforcement officials contact a person, inform them of accusations related to child pornography, or take steps to search their property and seize their devices, it is important to act quickly to make sure a person's rights will be protected and begin building a legal defense.
At Noorishad Law, P.C., our lawyer can provide representation for people in Tysons Corner who have been accused of possessing, distributing, or producing child pornography. He knows how isolating these accusations can be and how charges may affect a person's life, career, and relationships. He will provide guidance on the best options for defense that may be available while working to defend against a conviction that could lead to a lengthy prison sentence, lifetime registration as a sex offender, and other serious penalties.
For many years, the term "child pornography" has been used to describe images and videos depicting minors engaging in sexually explicit behavior. However, many law enforcement agencies and other public officials have shifted toward using the phrase "child sexual abuse material" (CSAM).
This change reflects changing attitudes toward pornography, with many people finding that materials depicting adults engaging in sexual conduct are acceptable. The use of CSAM may distinguish illegal child pornography from legal pornography depicting adults. The updated term is also meant to be a better description of the harm involved in the creation of these materials. Because of the increasingly harsh stance taken toward child pornography, people who are accused of CSAM-related offenses may be more likely to face severe penalties when they are convicted of sex crimes involving children.
In recent years, some child pornography cases have involved materials created using AI or other software tools without the involvement of actual children. However, these materials may still lead to criminal charges if they allegedly depict minors who can be identified. People who are accused of taking existing photos or videos of children and manipulating them to make it appear as if the children are engaging in sexual conduct may face charges similar to those that would apply to people who produce, distribute, or possess materials created by filming or photographing children.
A person who has been accused of creating child sexual abuse material or participating in its creation in any way may face some of the most serious charges that can apply for child pornography offenses. These charges may involve accusations that a person directly photographed or filmed minors as they engaged in sexual behavior, that a person took actions to coerce a child into creating child pornography, that a parent or another adult who was responsible for a child allowed CSAM to be produced, or that a person earned a profit by financing the creation of child pornography.
A person who is convicted of an offense involving CSAM production in Virginia involving a child under the age of 15 may face a prison sentence ranging from five to 30 years. If an offense allegedly involved a child between the ages of 15 and 18, a person may be sentenced to one to 20 years in prison. The potential sentence may increase if a person accused of CSAM production is at least seven years older than the child depicted in the materials or if a person is convicted of a second or subsequent offense.
Offenses involving the distribution of child pornography may address a wide range of conduct. In many cases, people who are accused of these offenses may not have planned to intentionally share or distribute CSAM. They could be charged with an offense based on allegations of activities such as:
To convict a person of CSAM distribution, a prosecutor must show that they knowingly distributed the material. The specific facts about how certain files were shared and whether a person understood what was being shared may be addressed when developing a defense strategy.
Knowledge is a required element of CSAM possession charges. If you did not know that certain files existed on your device, our lawyer may argue that you should not be convicted because you had no knowledge and did not intend to possess the materials in question.
Yes. CSAM production charges carry harsher penalties than CSAM possession charges. A person who has allegedly participated in the production of child pornography may have been involved in the sexual abuse of children, so they will most likely be treated more harshly than other offenders.
In a CSAM possession case, a prosecutor will generally need to show that a person knew that files were present and knew about their nature. If a person allegedly understood that files were CSAM, but did not access or view them, they could potentially still be charged with CSAM possession. However, it may be possible to show that a person who did not intentionally download files and did not open or view them was unaware of their nature, which may serve as a defense against CSAM possession charges.
In most cases involving CSAM charges, law enforcement officers will conduct forensic examinations of devices that they seize. They may look at what files are stored on a device and how they were accessed and downloaded. Information related to internet browser history may be used to identify the person who allegedly accessed or saved files. Our lawyer can review forensic reports and work with independent experts to challenge the findings of these examinations and demonstrate that a person did not knowingly possess CSAM.
A person can be charged with an offense involving the possession of child pornography if a search by law enforcement reveals that photos or videos that may be classified as CSAM are found on a phone, laptop, external hard drive, or other device. While some charges may involve files that a person is accused of deliberately accessing, downloading, or saving, others may involve files that were stored in a temporary internet cache, downloaded without a person's knowledge, or stored on a device used by multiple people.
Our attorney can help clients determine their best options for defense against accusations that they knowingly possessed child pornography. Some potential defense strategies may include:
When responding to criminal charges related to child pornography, it is crucial to secure legal representation as early as possible during a case. At Noorishad Law, P.C., our attorney can provide guidance on the best options for defense that may be available. Contact our Tysons Corner, VA CSAM charges lawyer at 703-542-4500 to set up a free consultation.
People in Tysons Corner who face criminal charges will usually have their cases heard at the Fairfax County Circuit Court, located at:
We represent clients in Fairfax County from our office in McLean, located at: